For semisimple Lie algebra targets
For discrete group targets
For discrete 2-group targets
For Lie 2-algebra targets
For targets extending the super Poincare Lie algebra
(such as the supergravity Lie 3-algebra, the supergravity Lie 6-algebra)
Chern-Simons-supergravity
for higher abelian targets
for symplectic Lie n-algebroid targets
for the $L_\infty$-structure on the BRST complex of the closed string:
higher dimensional Chern-Simons theory
topological AdS7/CFT6-sector
functorial quantum field theory
Reshetikhin?Turaev model? / Chern-Simons theory
FQFT and cohomology
physics, mathematical physics, philosophy of physics
theory (physics), model (physics)
experiment, measurement, computable physics
Axiomatizations
Tools
Structural phenomena
Types of quantum field thories
Dijkgraaf-Witten theory in dimension $n$ is the topological sigma-model quantum field theory whose target space is the classifying space of a discrete group and whose background gauge field is a circle n-bundle with connection on $\mathbf{B}G$ (necessarily flat) which is equivalently a cocycle in the group cohomology of $G$ with coefficients in the circle group.
Viewed in a broader context and generalizing: Dijkgraaf-Witten theory is the ∞-Chern-Simons theory induced from a characteristic class $\mathbf{c} : \mathbf{B}G \to \mathbf{B}^n U(1)$ on a discrete ∞-groupoid $\mathbf{B}G := Disc B G$. If $G$ here is an ordinary discrete group this is traditional Dijkgraaf-Witten theory, if $G$ is a discrete 2-group and the background field is a circle 4-bundle, then this is called the Yetter model.
This are the first two steps in filtering of target spaces by homotopy type truncation of ∞-Chern-Simons theory with discrete target spaces.
We may think of this as describing the quantum mechanics of an $(n-1)$-brane with $n$-dimensional worldvolume $\Sigma$ propagating on $B G$ and being charged under a higher analog of the electromagnetic field:
a field configuration over $\Sigma$ (a $\Sigma$-shaped trajectory) is a morphism $\phi : \Sigma \to \mathbf{B}G$, hence equivalently a $G$-principal bundle on $\Sigma$. The configuration space of fields over $\Sigma$ is the groupoid of $G$-principal bundles over $\Sigma$.
The background gauge field is a morphism $\alpha : \mathbf{B}G \to \mathbf{B}^n U(1)$ – hence a characteristic class for $G$: a cocycle of degree $n$ in the group cohomology of $G$.
The value of the Lagrangian $L(\phi)$ on a field configuration $\phi$ is the characteristic class of this bundle with respect to the universal characteristic class of the given circle n-bundle:
This is the classical field theory input of the model. The extended quantum field theory defined by this is supposed to be a rule that assigns space of states to lower dimensional pieces of $\Sigma$ and to $n$-dimensional $\Sigma$s a propagator.
The space of states assigned to a $\Sigma$ of dimension $n-k$ for $k \in \mathbb{N}$ is the k-groupoid of sections of the higher line bundle associated to the circle (n-k)-bundle $\tau_\Sigma \alpha$ obtained by transgression of $\alpha$ to the mapping space $\mathbf{H}(\Sigma, \mathbf{B}G)$.
The propagator on $\Sigma$ of dimension $n$ is given by the path integral computed with measure the groupoid cardinality of $\mathbf{B}G$ and integral kernel given by the action functional
that sends a field $\phi$ to the evaluation of $\alpha(\phi)$ on the fundamental class of $\Sigma$
(…)
The Dijkgraaf-Witten model is an example of (fully) extended topological quantum field theory. Namely, the above data not only assign an element in $U(1)$ to any closed $n$-dimensional manifold, but also a vector space to any closed $(n-1)$-dimensional manifold, a 2-vector space to any closed $(n-2)$ manifold, and so on, ending with an n-vector space assigned to the point. Also, manifolds with boundary corresponds to (higher) linear operators between these (higher) vector spaces. According to the cobordism hypothesis, the whole structure of the Dijkgraaf-Witten model as an fully extended TQFT is contained in the datum of the $n$-Vector space it assigns to the point. This is the space of sections of the flat $n$-vector bundle $\mathbf{B}G\to n Vect$ induced by the background field $\mathbf{B}G\to \mathbf{B}^n U(1)$.
Since the target space of Dijkgraaf-Witten theory is the delooping groupoid $\mathbf{B}G$ of a group $G$ (internal to Set), any background field given by a morphism $\alpha : \mathbf{B}G \to A$ in ∞Grpd is a cocycle in the group cohomology of $G$, as described there.
Here we have a finite (or discrete) group $G$, and a discrete abelian group $A$, and we want to define $H^n(G;A)$. A way of doing this is to realize everything topologically: from $G$ we build the classifying space $\mathcal{B}G$, and from $A$ the Eilenberg-MacLane space $\mathcal{B}^n A=K(A,n)$. Then we consider the space of maps $hom(\mathcal{B}G,\mathcal{B}^n A)$ (these are our cocycles) and take its $\pi_0$.
This way we have a familiar description, in a certain sense (topological spaces, continuous maps, homotopies,..), of the set $H^n(G;A)$. The drawback is that the topological spaces involved here are “gigantic” (infinite dimensional CW-complexes), where we had started with a very “little” datum: a finite group. So one can wonder if there is a finite model for the above construction, and the homotopy hypothesis serves it on a silver plate. Namely, since $G$ is discrete, $\mathcal{B}G$ is a 1-type, and nothing but the geometric realization of the delooping groupoid $\mathbf{B}G$ (boldface $B$ here); similarly $\mathcal{B}^n A$ is the topological geometric realization of the $n$-groupoid $\mathbf{B}^n A$, and the space of cocycles is $hom(B G,B^n A)$. since $G$ is a finite group, $B G$ is a finite groupoid, and so $hom(B G,B^n A)$ is a finite set. This set is the finite model for $hom(\mathcal{B}G,\mathcal{B}^n A)$ we were looking for.
To be continued…
The k-vector space associated with a closed oriented $(n-k)$-dimensional manifold $X_{n-k}$ admits a simple description in terms of sections:
The background field $\alpha : \mathbf{B}G \to A$ is transgressed to the mapping space $[\Pi(X_{n-k}), \mathbf{B}G]$ by forming the internal hom
where the last morphism is the projection on the k-truncation. This defines a cocycle on the space of fields $[\Pi(X_{n-k}), \mathbf{B}G]$ over $X_{n-k}$, which classifies some principal ∞-bundle on this space. Given a canonical representation of the spaces of phases $\tau_k [\Pi(X_{n-k}), A]$ on a k-vector space we obtain the corresponding associated bundle over the space of fields. The $(k-1)$-category assigned by the extended topological quantum field theory to the closed $X_{n-k}$ is the category of sections of this $k$-vector bundle.
We have
By general abstract reasoning (recalled at cohomology and fiber sequence, for instance) we have for the homotopy groups that
Now use the universal coefficient theorem, which asserts that we have an exact sequence
Since $U(1)$ is an injective $\mathbb{Z}$-module we have
Together this means that we have an isomorphism
that identifies the cohomology group in question with the internal hom in Ab from the integral homology group of $X_{n-k}$ to $U(1)$.
For $i\lt k$, the right hand side is zero, and so
For $i=k$, instead, $H_{n-i}(X_{n-k},\mathbb{Z})\simeq \mathbb{Z}$, since $X_{n-k}$ is a closed $(n-k)$-manifold and so
Another proof of the isomorphism $H^{n-k}(X_{n-k},U(1))\cong U(1)$ and of the identities $H^{n-i}(X_{n-k},U(1))=0$ for $i\lt k$ can be obtained as follows. Consider the short exact sequence of locally constant sheaves of abelian groups
This induces a long exact sequence in cohomology
For $i\lt k$ we have $H^{n-i}(X_{n-k},U(1))=0$ by dimensional reasons, while for $i=k$ we find the exact sequence
Since $X_{n-k}$ is a closed oriented manifold, we have $H^{n-k}(X_{n-k},\mathbb{Z})=\mathbb{Z}$, $H^{n-k}(X_{n-k},\mathbb{R})=\mathbb{R}$, and the map $H^{n-k}(X_{n-k},\mathbb{Z})\to H^{n-k}(X_{n-k},\mathbb{R})$ is the inclusion of $\mathbb{Z}$ into $\mathbb{R}$. Hence $H^{n-k}(X_{n-k},U(1))\cong \mathbb{R}/\mathbb{Z}\cong U(1)$.
This means that the transgression of the Dijkgraaf-Witten background field
to the space of field configurations $[\Pi(X_{n-k}), \mathbf{B}G]$ over $X_{n-k}$ is a cocycle of the form
This classifies a $\mathbf{B}^{k-1} U(1)$-principal ∞-bundle $P$ over the space of field configurations, given by the pullback
(Here $\mathbf{E} \mathbf{B}^{k-1} U(1)$ is as described at universal principal ∞-bundle.)
By the canonical $k$-representation $\rho : \mathbf{B}^k U(1) \to k Vect_{\mathbb{C}}$ of $\mathbf{B}^{k-1}U(1)$ on complex k-vector spaces, we have associated to this canonically a $k$-vector bundle $E$, which may be realized as the pullback
Here $k Vect_*$ is the k-category of pointed $k$-vector bundles, see again generalized universal bundle for more.
If $X_{n-k}$ is closed then the $k$-vector spaces associated by the TFT to $X_{n-k}$ is the (k-1)-category of sections of this bundle $E$.
…
Dijkgraaf-Witten theory is to be thought of as the finite group version of Chern-Simons theory. Chern-Simons theory looks formally just as the above, only that all finite $n$-groupoids appearing here are replaced by Lie ∞-groupoids (∞-stacks on CartSp).
The idea originates, of course, in
The discussion of the quasi-Hopf algebra associated with a group cohomology 3-cocycle $c \colon \mathbf{B}G \to \mathbf{B}^3 U(1)$ originates in
A review is in
and conceptual clarifications were established in
and, earlier, in an unpublished manuscript of Paul Bressler (2002-2004). See at Drinfeld double for more on this.
A first comprehensive structural account of DW theory as a functorial QFT was given in
A review is given on p. 68 of
First steps towards understand DW theory as an extended TQFT appear in
Discussion aiming towards a refinement of DW theory to an extended TQFT is in
Further conceptual refinement of this is indicated in section 3 and section 8 of
This proposes a general abstract way to construct path integral quantizations for finite group theories such as DW, see also at prequantum field theory. More along these lines is in
See also
For more on this see the discussion on the n-Forum.
Jeffrey C. Morton, Cohomological Twisting of 2-Linearization and Extended TQFT, arXiv:1003.5603.
Section 2 and 3 of Gijs Heuts and Jacob Lurie‘s Ambidexterity, in: Topology and Field Theories, doi.
Section 3 of Daniel Freed, Michael Hopkins, Jacob Lurie, Constantin Teleman, Topological quantum field theories from compact Lie groups, arXiv:0905.0731.